It's not so much to speak on it, but to turn to our Parks Canada witnesses to provide comment on it.
When I had first read this, I thought that it was, perhaps, redundant because I saw that we already had the statement in there of “all aspects of the management of the Park”. To me, that seems to be broad and inclusive. I didn't know what the benefit was of bringing in the extra qualifiers. I just saw it as already being broad and inclusive.
I don't know if Parks Canada wants to comment on whether we need to add qualifiers, or if the existing wording is sufficient to deal with the kind of concern that Ms. May has raised.