It would help if Mr. Amos or someone from that side would explain why. My sense is that Mr. Fast was keen on getting onto the protected areas piece first and was tempted to make his vote somewhat contingent on it. That didn't happen, but I've seen the reordering. I assumed that the first ordering was according to priority but maybe it wasn't or it's been reconsidered. I just don't know why. If there were an explanation, that would certainly help me out with regard to voting one way or another.
On February 25th, 2016. See this statement in context.