The value is that it enables us to treat both the prioritization aspect of this discussion as well as the substantive, what we are going to discuss, all in one motion. Going through the process of evaluating Mr. Cullen's substance, without having any prioritization attached, puts us in a situation, which I think would be unfortunate and lead to confusion, that we were somehow voting down his motion and not appreciating the content. We do appreciate the content. We are very interested in climate change. We don't want that confusion to arise.
I think the most collegial way would be to say if the motion were to be retracted, with knowledge that it would be included—