Sure.
There are two points that I would raise in answer to your question.
In the first instance, money that comes to Parks Canada comes under a single vote, unlike in many other places where there's a division between capital and operating. Given the issues of occupational health and safety and the sorts of life-and-limb issues that accompany many of our issues related to infrastructure, such as the fortifications around the walls of Quebec City, for example, or washouts on highways, we always go in and fix those things before they kill somebody or injure someone. When you have to do that without the right amount of infrastructure money, it means that you take away from operations. In fact, while this money is labelled for infrastructure, it reduces the call on the monies we have that otherwise go to protection and effectively adds it back, in many ways, to operations. It is an absolutely critical trade-off to significantly expand our ability to fund operations.
The second point I would raise is that in 2011 there were 169 science professionals at Parks Canada. That dropped by 50 two years later, in 2013, and at that time Parks Canada was in the process of developing a plan. We've now published the first result of that plan. Today, we're back up to 150 people, despite the fact that what we're doing now is implementing that plan rather than developing it. The number of people who are today in the process of delivering on that plan is arguably even greater than it was before 2011. Again, some of the infrastructure money that has come in will relieve pressure and that will allow us to increase some of that science capacity.