Okay.
Another key area that was discussed in the last report was under burden of proof. To me, it seemed to make a lot of sense. Right now, the burden of proof is on us to show that the chemical shouldn't exist. All of our resources go towards trying to prove that a chemical is or is not a toxic substance, rather than, in regard to the burden of proof, utilizing industry to prove that it is acceptable.
Has any action been taken on that categorization or on how that's determined?