In terms of specific challenges in the implementation of this legislation, the members of the opposition have pointed to changes that have been made to enforcement. I wonder if you could point to any specific aspects of CEPA 1999's implementation that have proven to be problematic from the perspective not of administrative efficiency but in pursuing the public interest. Are there aspects of this legislation where, in the department's estimation, they are limited in terms of where they can go to prevent toxic substances from entering the environment? I might add to that, perhaps you can comment on the discretion that is built into this statute that really provides a fair degree of latitude for the minister to determine the toxicity of a substance. I wonder if that latitude has in any circumstance created an impediment.
