That's a really good point.
I've read through the Auditor General's reports. I think they mention that many of the other custodian departments don't have that the way Parks Canada does, so there's no public reporting on the state of these sites, and even FHBRO buildings that other departments.... That may be something we need to look at in recommendations.
Natalie, I wanted to get your thoughts. You talked about the “do no harm” policy as something the federal government can do. I don't think you mentioned the “heritage first” policy, and I've heard that's something in the States. Could you comment on that as another thing we could explore?