I think you've described something that is natural, given the development of the country, and the important thing is to try always to find out whether there are areas that are under-represented in programs or under-represented in terms of emphasis of attention by the government or by parts of the government that could be helpful.
I'm not qualified, really, to comment on that except to say that in terms of the recognition that we recommend for designation, there are a number of nominations that come forward from small towns or from individuals in rural areas and we've tried to make sure that these nominations will receive very full consideration. All a nomination really requires is a simple letter of maybe a paragraph saying, “I would like to have considered for national designation X” and maybe put in a sentence about why you think X might be a decent candidate. Then the staff at Parks Canada that we have at our disposal—it makes it sound as if it's extensive; it isn't—in looking at everything that comes in, will do a preliminary investigation and if they believe there is some real merit, they go ahead and do all the research and all the effort themselves. In terms of getting recognition, it's a relatively simple thing within the system.
I think the system responds pretty effectively from that point of view, to anything that comes from an individual who has an idea that they feel is very important but don't have the resources or the background or whatever to develop the thing. Parks Canada will do that.