Who's to say, but I would say, given reality, since the government has established it at $10 million and did it for two years, I think that level should be maintained. In other words, it would be nice if it were higher. If it's to go lower, I think all the good things that we've talked about, and spinoffs, and the leverage, and doing more in rural areas, and all the rest of it, get contradicted. I think maintaining and extending is very significant, and must be done. I really think that's important because I saw what happened when the previous program went from about $6 million or $7 million, down to $1 million. It was very bad, and very discouraging throughout the heritage community right across the country.
On September 19th, 2017. See this statement in context.