I don't think there is much in the bill before us for charities. I was listening in on the previous testimony, and I think it did get touched on.
Essentially, what we are suggesting with respect to the reference to registered charities is that.... There are a number of charities out there that exist for the purposes of preserving historic properties for the benefit of the public. They acquire the property—either they purchase it outright, or it is donated to the registered charity—and then the charity becomes responsible for preserving that building. You see that in a number of different cities. You can go and visit. It really is for the benefit of the public. As an individual or as a corporation, you can support those activities through donations, either straight cash donations or donations of stock, which get special tax treatment.
I guess what we are trying to point out is that there is already, through the tax system, a mechanism for the support of historic properties, although obviously it doesn't apply to private owners of historic properties.