Every project is different. Every pro forma and calculation is different. I think it's impossible to say what the right amount is. I think the best answer is that the American example has worked well. I was told it was 25%, but it's actually 20%, which is identical to what we've proposed here. It has generated lots of results.
It seems to be where officials within Parks Canada were heading. In terms of the development of the policy here, I've carried that forward. There seems to be a broad consensus that it's as good a number as you could arrive at.
There will probably still be projects for which it won't be enough. If you have too many heritage elements and not enough potential revenues downstream, it won't do the job for you. Maybe there will be the odd project where it is not needed because the project is so naturally successful, even without a tax credit. You have to settle on a number, and it seems to be a number that works.