We are relying on the standards and guidelines that have been developed by Parks Canada. It was done by a lot of professionals over a considerable period of time. The idea is to separate out the normal stuff you would do as part of a regular development project, which wouldn't be eligible for the credit, but the stuff that is specifically heritage restoration oriented would be eligible for the credit.
I think that's the right approach, a sensible approach. I do think there is reasonable rigour. At the end of the day, you have to rely on professionals to assess that. That was done in the case of the grant program with in-house architects. We're shifting the burden so that it is outside architects who get retained and do that, but we'll have the professional expertise to do it. In all those cases, it will be experienced individuals with professional qualifications in exactly that area who do the assessments.