It's a very good question.
The way we wanted to frame it is that there are advantages and disadvantages of each approach. My sense is—and we're not experts on the spending side—that it could well be easier. One of the points we made is that if you're trying to achieve rural equity, whether it's regional or sectoral or urban, spending programs might lend themselves more easily to that. At the same time, there could be a loss of other forms of flexibility, so it's about managing the trade-offs.