The only thing I would say to that—somebody said it earlier—is that one does not exclude the other.
This is a bill that starts a process, and you have to start somewhere. You can't always accommodate everything, but you can use other mechanisms to stimulate exactly what you're talking about. One will not exclude the other, and going with one under a bill like this will start the process going for the kinds of built heritage that would be eligible. Working towards a broader stimulative approach through a grant mechanism will certainly help homeowners and other built heritage that is not in the commercial mainstream.