Thank you very much.
Thank you, Mr. Bossio, for indulging that. I just want to follow up on that same line of questioning by Mr. Sopuck.
I would tend to disagree that wealth creation is a prerequisite. I would almost suggest that in order to be sustainable, all elements of sustainability need to be looked at as prerequisites.
For example, when I was the mayor of Kingston, when industry was trying to set up in our community, they weren't particularly looking for the community that had the lowest taxes in order to create the most wealth. They were looking for the communities that had the best quality of life because they knew they could retain human capital there, and individuals who would be interested in living in that community would then end up benefiting the economic interests of the industry because they would retain that high calibre of individual.
I'm curious if you would like to just expand a little bit on how you see that balance. I've always defined sustainability as a balance between economic, social, cultural, and environmental factors with the understanding that they all have to operate together at the same time in order to be prosperous.
Ms. Pearce, would you like to comment on that?