I was going to say that one thing that we would love to see, because people approach us fairly often with new ideas and new approaches, is more research and development being done on these products at the federal level. They don't necessarily always have to be done in the north. If they're being done as assemblies, approaches, or the longevity-type of material, and they want to test down south, they can be tested in a lab-type setting, in a controlled wind-tunnel type setting, built down south, and then left to age in the elements to give some kind of understanding of their applicability versus always looking at trying to do it as a pilot project in the north, where you don't necessarily have the personnel to do the monitoring, to maintain good data, as well as to do any follow-up that's necessary on it. We'd like to see more of that understanding from research and development and what can be done within and outside the territory.
It's great that CHARS, the High Arctic research station, now exists, and I think these discussions probably will begin around it.
Okay?