That's a good question.
What I was trying to get at when I spoke of the evolution of the buildings that the social housing portfolio has produced over the decades is that ultimately what we're dealing with up here is trying to find the balance.
When you come up with a national standard, which you're trying to push the whole country towards, as we've talked about here—for example, a passive house standard, or a net zero standard, which is more current state of the art, let's say—the various jurisdictions have various abilities to actually implement such a thing. Down south, it may be a very reasonable goal, and as Mr. Hewitt pointed out, maybe even with building code changes, you can push the jurisdictions more down that road. The problem for us is that if you make things into national standards and they have to be applied right across the board, our capacity in the north is at a different level.
As Mr. Fournier pointed out, they designed and built that pilot project passive house, and it resulted in extremely thick walls to make those R values state of the art. It was a very good house.