From our perspective, the perspective of Environmental Defence, I think, as I outlined in my statement, is that there are a number of gaps within the legislation, CEPA, that have enabled the investigation to proceed in the way that it did. These issues were highlighted and underscored in the review by the ENVI committee in 2017 that resulted in a number of recommendations on how the enforcement provisions could be improved.
From our perspective, the legislative framework is a key problem, and the fact is that we weren't able to get much information from the government when the investigation was happening, which was due to the fact that the legislation did not compel the government to provide that information to us. I'm not able to answer the second part of the question about whether there were other factors at play, because I don't have the information at hand.