I fully agree with Ms. Le Quéré, but allow me to add something. Of course, the decision to either keep the commissioner within the Office of the Auditor General or make him an officer of Parliament is not the most important element that will influence Canada's image internationally. What is important in this respect is to know whether or not we will achieve our targets. In fact, there is tremendous uncertainty regarding our ability to reach our current objective for 2030. As for the target planned for 2050, let's not even talk about it. So it is in the broader context of urgency of taking action for the climate that we should consider the place of the commissioner of the environment and sustainable development within the organization.
I will use this opportunity to make a suggestion. As Mr. Lindgren was saying, things have been this way for 27 years, and it is not working very well. This could be an opportunity to give the commissioner a new title, as was done for the minister and the department six years ago. In other words, he could become the commissioner of the environment and climate change.