The answer is sadly no, because the commissioner of the environment has suffered from what I mentioned is the chronic underfunding that has been afflicting the Auditor General for the last 10 years. In the same way that the number of audits per year has gone from 27 to 14, resources have shrunk across the board in the Office of the Auditor General, and the commissioner of the environment has not been protected from that shrinking of resources.
Whereas 10 years ago there was expert staff working full time with the commissioner of the environment, he no longer has that capacity, or at least not to the extent he used to, and now he has to go and find people to do specific jobs because they are not attributed to him on a full-time basis, and they do not have the expertise that is required to carry out the commissioner of the environment's work.