I might point again to the example of New Zealand, which I think has a lot of interesting lessons for Canada. Madam Pauzé referred to Bill C-12, which would be Canada's first climate law. New Zealand has had such a law in place for a number of years. It was initially recommended by their commissioner for the environment. I think that's an excellent example of proactive policy advice. This was not policy-making, obviously. This was from the point of view of an independent officer of Parliament, with his own dedicated budget, with his own ability to set his agenda and hire expert staff and make expert recommendations. Certainly, New Zealand parliamentarians seemed to think this was very valuable input to their debates in the adoption of that law.
More recently, the commissioner for the environment in New Zealand has recommended amendments to the law. It's been in place for a number of years, and therefore there has been some experience gained. He has evaluated the experience gained in the first few years of implementation and made recommendations accordingly. I think the parliamentary debate is all the richer for it.