No. Again, it's a categorical “no” to the bill as written.
Do we support the Basel Convention? Absolutely. Do we support other means to address plastic waste? Absolutely. A one-sentence bill for a complex issue like this, given the size of the economy you're talking about and the issues we have to solve, is not an acceptable bill for the problem at hand. I think we've heard everybody say the same, with suggestions of an amendment here, an amendment here.
One of the MPs suggested giving this adequate consideration when we're in the discussion on the reform of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act. That would be much more acceptable. This bill is not commensurate with the challenges at hand. It's a categorical “no”.