Thank you for that question.
I'll build on Mr. Puckett's commentary around good and bad recycling.
First of all, I think the spirit here is to get more transparency on what it is we are collecting and sending to other shores, and certainly that is similar to what we should be doing domestically as well. Under the guise of recycling, as I mentioned in my comments, not all recyclable material is in fact recycled. We need traceability from points of generation through to final disposition. An outright ban on exporting is not really getting at the heart of the issue, which that is no matter what we are generating or how we are generating it or where it is actually managed, we need to have a line of sight on what that is to ensure that the materials are managed to the highest end uses, and also under very strict human and health protections.
Beyond that, we need to actually start creating demand. We have much more net generated material than we are able to recycle away. We need to create the kinds of demands that create value, and in fact we can try to build the recycling industry right here domestically. We have the power to do that through product specification and through government procurement, all of those activities that increase the amount of recycled content in the products and packaging that we're creating. This can actually increase the value of plastics and, by increasing their value, start to increase recycling here at home.