If I may say so, though I don't know if it is in order for me to make this comment, if we're talking about one meeting and we definitely agree to this, we can't overload it with witnesses or it will just become unworkable. That's why we often let the analysts and the chair and the clerk work together to try to find a balance.
Your motion is talking about the officials who were here today, and you said Mr. Davidson should be invited, but I don't think, to be honest with you and I'd have to look into this, it would be right to put Mr. Davidson on a panel with officials and have them debate. I think that would be totally wrong. One would have to go before the other.
Theoretically we could add other people to sit with Mr. Davidson, and that would be fine, but if it's only one meeting, practically speaking, we can't just add a whole list.
Mr. Saini, I'm not sure you formally presented a certain witness's name. I thought you were just throwing some names out there as potential witnesses. Do you want to say specifically the Federation of Canadian Municipalities?