I know it's not fair to ask the officials to weigh in on a political discussion, but I'm wondering about the process going forward of how a regulatory review would happen in order to solve all the issues that we've identified, and there are many. How much time does it take to...?
When we did the Basel convention, and we did the work with the United States, we developed our lists and we did all the work that needed to be done to have effective legislation. Would there be the same types of people involved in reviewing this legislation to propose amendments back to the government? Do we wait for the courts to say that what we're asking to do is in provincial jurisdiction and is not constitutional? What's the process, going forward, of reviewing this? Have we given it enough time to go through the proper review?