I agree with how the list of proposed reasons, which you just mentioned in terms of how we assess products, are being assessed. I think persistence, toxicity and ubiquity are important. It's how we address persistent and ubiquitous chemicals. They persist in organic pollutants or priority substances.
As for things that are unnecessary or unsustainable to end of life, for sure I agree with those criteria. I think what you're asking me is whether we've assessed all of the products correctly and are actually using those criteria. For that, I would look to the government and ask whether we should be looking closely at other products.