I do agree with it. Because we see these items commonly in the environment, the criteria were right: They're common in the environment; they may cause harm; they're not practically recyclable—I understand that they can be recycled, but the markets aren't necessarily here—and they're replaceable or can be replaced with reusable products.
I agree with it. We have to build a circular economy that includes recyclables for sure, but for items that are hard to recycle, that aren't being recycled and that are unnecessary, I do think the government is moving in the right direction.