I'm sorry, but I'd like to talk about Quebec.
In Quebec, the right to live in a healthy environment that respects biodiversity has been recognized since 2006, and is included in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
To the extent that this right is quasi-constitutional in scope and protects all Quebeckers, I question the appropriateness of including in the legislation sections that have the same purpose but less legal weight.
Don't you think the bill should have been enshrined in the Canadian Constitution rather than in the preamble of an act? It seems to me that it would carry a lot more weight if it were included in a quasi-constitutional charter rather than in the preamble of an act, no matter how good it is.