Certainly, sequestration is hugely important, obviously, and carbon sinks are absolutely critical. I think that, if that's something the committee wants to add to the bill, that could potentially make sense.
I would caution against rolling it into the existing planning and reporting structures without careful consideration, simply because right now the structure of the bill is that it sets a target. It plans to achieve that target and implements measures to do that, and it reports on that. It would be a significant restructure. I think it would make more sense to have a separate requirement for a report on carbon sinks, rather than trying to roll it into that process, but in principle it seems like a good idea.