With all due respect, Mr. Minister, the bill refers to an advisory committee, not an expert committee. You have only one climate scientist on the current body. I think it was disrespectful to this committee and the parliamentary process to jump the gun and appoint an advisory committee before the bill had even had a single witness to talk about why so many people and experts believe we should model ourselves much more on the U.K. climate committee, which is universally respected for its expertise. You have one climate scientist on your advisory body. Professor Donner has been clear that Canada's climate target for 2030, if we're going to pull our fair share, should be somewhere between 96% and 99% reductions below the emissions today, but he'll be surrounded by other stakeholders who have other views.
I wonder if you will reconsider the composition—more than the people on it, the structure of it—to be much more like the U.K. expert body that sets carbon budgets.