This is not an innovative bill in the sense that it follows other national climate framework laws. In that respect, I don't see the rationale of including an economic objective. I see net zero as an investment opportunity.
For instance, if we look at the U.K. example, what has an assessment of the first 10 years of the U.K. legislation given us? Well, it's been hugely influential in terms of investment security for the renewables. It has unlocked huge capital investments that needed to be made, because they are carbon budgets that are planned for five years and planned for 10 years. That's visibility, and that is an economic stimulus. That's what we need. That's what is holding Canada back at the moment.