More information is always helpful. Of course, it has to pertain to the details of what that information is going to look like. It's also, though, the input that we're really trying to put stress on.
When you look at an advisory body that's being proposed, I think it's going to have the ability to get to that 100,000-foot level in terms of its recommendations and what it's thinking about, and how it will plan the decarbonization strategies. The reality is that to make these reductions in a way that maximizes the efficiency of the reductions, ensures good jobs and ensures sustainable communities means you're going to have to include the people who are in the industry who know what the business models look like and who understand how the technologies can be applied.
Information out is great, but I think there is a need for a consultation process, so that the people who are going to be managing these different industries, through these strategies, are heard and are able to communicate what would need to happen to be able to scale some of these technologies or change these business models in a way that moves us toward these goals. I think that's something that isn't clear right now—where business is going to come in—and maybe an economic lens in the legislation will help to encourage that kind of input.