They're significant. It essentially means that you might have had an emissions reduction strategy that no longer meets the goal that the government sets. It creates ripple effects where there are concerns. We've moved from, say, a 30% benchmark now, to 40%, to 45%. Well, how is that going to be achieved? Are we going to see more stringent policy? Does it mean that certain investments we've planned and made are no longer as attractive as they previously were? Does it mean that financial markets will not allocate capital to those projects?
On the lower level, down to less gravity, it's even a concern for small and medium-sized businesses, which are seeing a carbon price of $170 per tonne. These are groups that, as I think you've mentioned, are key to Canada's climate change strategy but generally don't have the resources and the sort of expertise—