I think it would not hurt to have the targets in the bill. A lot of the discussion about what they should be has already taken place. It's true that if we look at international panels and agreements, the targets are higher for Canada, and certainly I agree with the comment that targets should be achievable. However, this is a matter of articulating in the plan a target that is achievable. I think the higher the target, the better, and 60% should certainly be what we aim for. It will get us there faster. That way, if we do fall short to 45%, it's better than falling below 45%.
In terms of—