It is, yes. Thank you.
I would say that we need to be much more creative and, as you said, honest in conveying the depth of change that's required to meet targets of this ambition level. As we all have reflected already many times, we've failed to meet targets in the past, so deep changes are required.
I think this comes down to essentially our vision of the future. What does a decarbonized Canada look like? There are a lot of different ways it can and should look. There isn't just one vision. I think it's really important to open up that conversation so we have a broader diversity of visions, not just of the end goal, but also the pathways to get there, so those visions don't end up being sort of deeply conventional. I'm concerned that when we talk about what the future looks like, we essentially want to retain the fabric of our communities, the structure of our cities and our lifestyles exactly as they are, but we flip the switch and the power is produced a different way.
What we're describing here in terms of a net-zero Canada by 2050 is a much deeper transformation than that.