I think a near-term target is crucial. The baseline shuffling is one way of obscuring the level of ambition that we are claiming we're reaching for. It's easy to lose that nuance, but by choosing that more recent baseline, we're masking all those years that our emissions were going up, so that reduction by 2030 or 2050 is much more modest.
I am absolutely of the mind that a near-term ambitious target is an important part of the process.