Yes. I have a couple of things.
I guess you have to start somewhere when it comes to putting together the institutional supports that this regime requires. It's not all that surprising that the minister put together this group, apparently on a volunteer basis, from what I understand, on Monday. If the bill becomes law, one would probably expect a more robust process and probably revisions to the terms of reference, and perhaps within that, some kind of competency matrix to make sure it does have the right makeup. Hopefully that will be based on some of the helpful input this committee has been receiving about the importance of diverse expert individuals and roles.
One option on that front, though, would be to look at some of the new provisions in the federal Impact Assessment Act and the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, which explicitly require a minimum of one indigenous person to serve on different advisory and expert bodies. That could be detailed at the statutory level, or it could be detailed at the below-statute level, in terms of reference or a similar instrument. That may be a recommendation this committee wants to consider. It may be a level of detail deeper than this statute goes, but it could be achieved, again, at the statute level or at the guidance and terms of reference level.