Dan Albas at the Environment and Sustainable Development Committee

On May 26th, 2021. See this statement in context.

May 26th, 2021 / 6:10 p.m.

Conservative

Dan Albas Conservative Central Okanagan—Similkameen—Nicola, BC

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

I'm going to take a slightly different perspective from that of Madam Michaud, but I do appreciate her input on the subject.

Let me first start with a question for Mr. Moffet. The first part of this amendment reads:

(1.1) Each greenhouse gas emissions target must represent a progression beyond the previous one.

Usually, when we say we're going to reduce something by a certain time, one would expect that there would be a logical progression. Is there anything specific in this particular part of the amendment that is not redundant?

See context to find out what was said next.