No.
I apologize if I sound like I am splitting hairs. The short answer is that the act makes a fairly significant distinction between targets and plans. This particular amendment has to do with establishing a 2025 plan, whereas the subsequent NDP amendment that you referred to would require that the 2030 plan include a GHG emission objective, which introduces a third term. The objective would be for 2026. It would be an element of the 2030 plan that would need to be published within six months of the bill coming into force.
I hope that's clear.