It's 366, as I read it.
If I may, Mr. Chair, I think Mr. Albas's point is well taken, and I stand properly chagrined for not having hit the brakes and clarified the rules. I think all of us have learned something about a fairly esoteric aspect of this procedure, but the goal here really is to not let the procedure stand in the way of the will of the committee, and it does feel that if we were simply to move on....
I would point out that G-5 requires us to vote on G-4. If we don't adopt G-4, or something along those lines, then G-5 no longer makes any sense, so it is important that we deal with this, and I appreciate the time that the other members of the committee have given to this. I think the majority of the committee feels that this is an important aspect of the bill and would like to see it adopted.