Thank you, Mr. Chair.
If I understand correctly the spirit of this amendment, in the unfortunate scenario that the government were to miss one of its targets, it would not lower its sights. It would commit to working harder and getting back on track towards the various targets it set. The intention is that the pace of change accelerates over time, and doesn't decelerate, so that we're in good shape to hit those targets and get to where we need to be by 2050.
That's my interpretation of the progression beyond the previous one's language. Maybe I would ask Mr. Saini if that was the intention behind the amendment. That was my understanding.