Mr. Chair, on Mr. Albas's last comment, I'd be happy to contribute more comments if, perhaps, he would think about contributing fewer. That way we could proceed through the bill in a little bit more of an efficient fashion.
To speak directly to the amendment in front of us, the NDP doesn't have major issues with the current name of the advisory body, the Net-Zero Advisory Body. I'm somewhat agnostic as to what it's named. I believe that the more important test is its composition and the definition of that composition. We will soon have an amendment, NDP-5, that will be coming forward. It speaks directly to the composition and does use the word “expertise”, which I believe encompasses the spirit of Ms. May's amendment. I'll speak to that amendment when it comes up in the order.
I will note that the language for that amendment is adapted directly from the New Zealand and U.K. legislation and their definitions of their advisory bodies.
Thank you, Mr. Chair.