I think that Ms. Collins is right. We should have the environment commissioner. Those reports, there are a lot in them. I think this committee's first duty is to look at the work that has been done by the commissioner. I'm not opposed to our making that our second meeting, but we have had instances in other committees where the subcommittee met, and just with this in mind. Then perhaps the environment commissioner is aware that we wish to see him and to talk about those reports. Then it's just a matter of scheduling that second meeting.
I think we can have a subcommittee report where we start the business, as long as there is agreement from all parties that, in regard to the environment commissioner, because he will be waiting in the room for the adoption of that report, the expectation is that we wouldn't reject that report and then send him away. That would be a waste of time.