Yes, definitely. Export Development Canada is very anomalous compared with such agencies in any of our peer countries in the way that its export finance is structured. There's the Canada account, which acts, often, as a government slush fund: $3 billion of that $13.6 billion a year in finance for oil and gas over the last three years has been for the Trans Mountain pipeline. We also see from its corporate account there are both loans and insurance, and a variety of financial products basically that are going to oil and gas.
We basically see, time and time again, that Canada's own federal reviews have shown there's fairly poor transparency of EDC compared with other export credit agencies in other countries. The terms of this finance on the transaction level are often not known, but we know on the whole that these are often more preferential than what private institutions can give. Beyond that, because it's using the Government of Canada's triple-A credit rating and it is also ultimately backed by the government, this allows EDC to assume risks that private banks would deem unacceptably high and basically on the margin. It helps fossil fuel projects that wouldn't otherwise be able to go forward to go forward and attract more private financing.
It's projects like the Coastal GasLink pipeline. Moreover, Enbridge has received $300 million over the last few years. Its LNG projects. I'm happy to give other examples, but it's a good summary.