I understand I have 30 seconds, Mr. Chair.
The question I'd like to pursue.... I may get more time from Madame Pauzé, I hope.
The question is related to the Supreme Court of Canada reference case. It's clear from this reference case that the entirety of the unconstitutionality within the impact assessment regime stems from changes made under the Harper regime in the so-called CEAA 2012.
What I want to know is this: Is the department examining using the recommendations from the expert panel in order to remedy the illegalities that crept in in 2012?