That's a very complicated question.
What I know from research is that, if you start introducing economic criteria in the allocation of the water, you will reduce losses. We had a speaker in the previous session who was talking about wildfires and the need for prevention, instead of treating the results or the damage costs afterwards. I think it's a matter of a cost-benefit analysis and identifying preventive measures in water allocation for specific essential sectors or water uses. What are the benefits? In the case of wildfire, it's avoiding damage costs.
You can do that for every sector. You can identify how much it costs if we pump the water in one direction and not in the other, and what benefits are involved. I think there is a need for more of that kind of economic analysis in the allocation of water.