Yes, that is a good analogy, because essentially the building that they're having to deal with now is much bigger than the one they were thinking of.
That's actually partly because one of our older audits said that you don't have a good handle on the degree of contamination at certain sites, or the geographic distribution of the contaminated sites.
I don't want to criticize them for filling in those knowledge gaps, even though it does require that the financial liability number goes up. However, that's not the only reason the financial liability number has gone up, but it is a legitimate reason for a good portion of that. Essentially, the project is a bigger one than they thought it was.