Great. Maybe I will switch to some questions about the taxonomy itself.
You've already captured some of the reasons it might be different from the EU taxonomy, and while that taxonomy isn't perfect, the key difference that I see is the difference between what is considered a transition fuel and transition.... It appears to me that the EU is really looking for us not to lock in carbon-intensive assets, whereas the made-in-Canada one seems to have put in a bunch of loopholes that allow for that carbon lock-in.