I think my remarks suggest that in fact phasing out fuel subsidies, in lots of cases, can support economic growth, and that prudent management of public funds is a key part of long-term prosperity. In the face of global transitions and big shifts in international markets, 90% of global GDP has committed to achieving net zero.
If they follow through on those commitments, that represents a seismic shift in demand for fossil fuel products and absolutely changes the long-term payoffs of investments, both public and private, in the sector. In terms of sustaining economic growth and prudently managing public dollars, phasing out that support makes economic sense as much as environmental sense.