I'm saying what the IPCC scientists are also saying, which is that the best path to a 1.5°C future includes carbon dioxide removal, but through natural, nature-based solutions and not through engineered CCUS. Certainly, both the IEA and the IPCC don't allow for....
The lion's share of that CCUS that's in the IEA's net-zero road map is actually not for the oil and gas sector, but sectors like cement. They're some of those niche sectors that we will still need in 2050, when we don't know what other decarbonization options are there.